Military Law Attorneys

UCMJ Military Law Lawyers

Sris — Wed, 16 Apr 2008 20:15:50 +0000

“Evidence was sufficient to establish that charge was preferred and received within time provided by statute of limitations by an officer exercising summary court-martial jurisdiction over accused”. U.S. v. Massey 17 M.J. 683 ACMR,(1983).

If you are charged with a UCMJ military offense or need counsel on a military matter, then contact a military lawyer of the SRIS Law Group. Our military lawyers are experts at defending and providing counsel to clients regarding UCMJ military matters. When you contact a SRIS Law Group military attorney, a military lawyer from our firm will discuss the facts of your case and advise you as to your options. If you need legal counsel, then contact a military lawyer at the law offices of SRIS Law Group, PC, to speak with a military attorney.

Alabama Military Lawyer, Alaska Military Lawyer, Arizona Military Lawyer, Arkansas Military Lawyer, California Military Lawyer, Colorado Military Lawyer, Connecticut Military Lawyer, Delaware Military Lawyer, Florida Military Lawyer, Georgia Military Lawyer, Hawaii Military Lawyer, Idaho Military Lawyer, Illinois Military Lawyer, Indiana Military Lawyer, Iowa Military Lawyer, Kansas Military Lawyer, Kentucky Military Lawyer, Louisiana Military Lawyer, Maine Military Lawyer, Maryland Military Lawyer, Massachusetts Military Lawyer, Michigan Military Lawyer, Minnesota Military Lawyer, Mississippi Military Lawyer, Missouri Military Lawyer, Montana Military Lawyer, Nebraska Military Lawyer, Nevada Military Lawyer, New Hampshire Military Lawyer, New Jersery Military Lawyer, New Mexico Military Lawyer, New York Military Lawyer, North Carolina Military Lawyer, North Dakota Military Lawyer, Ohio Military Lawyer, Oklahoma Military Lawyer, Oregon Military Lawyer, Pennsylvania Military Lawyer, Rhode Island Military Lawyer, South Carolina Military Lawyer, South Dakota Military Lawyer, Tennessee Military Lawyer, Texas Military Lawyer, Utah Military Lawyer, Vermont Military Lawyer, Virginia Military Lawyer, Washington Military Lawyer, West Virginia Military Lawyer, Wisconsin Military Lawyer, Wyoming Military Lawyer

Tags: Military+Law, millitary+lawyer, attorney+military, military, military+divorce+lawyer, AWOL, UCMJ, JAG, Armed+Forces, Army, Navy, Marine+Corps, Coast+Guard, National+Guard

UCMJ Military Law Lawyers

Sris — Wed, 16 Apr 2008 20:15:43 +0000

“Before taking action to eradicate ambiguity in sentence imposed by summary court-martial, convening authority should have returned record to summary court-martial for proceedings in revision”. U.S. v. Massey 17 M.J. 683 ACMR,(1983).

Tags: Military+Law, millitary+lawyer, attorney+military, military, military+divorce+lawyer, AWOL, UCMJ, JAG, Armed+Forces, Army, Navy, Marine+Corps, Coast+Guard, National+Guard

UCMJ Military Law Lawyers

Sris — Wed, 16 Apr 2008 20:15:35 +0000

“Failure to specify limits of restriction included in sentence imposed by summary court-martial was error and rendered the sentence ambiguous”. U.S. v. Massey 17 M.J. 683 ACMR,(1983).

Tags: Military+Law, millitary+lawyer, attorney+military, military, military+divorce+lawyer, AWOL, UCMJ, JAG, Armed+Forces, Army, Navy, Marine+Corps, Coast+Guard, National+Guard

UCMJ Military Law Lawyers

Sris — Wed, 16 Apr 2008 20:15:27 +0000

“Even though court-martial convening order recited “A special court-martial is hereby convened.” convening order which amended the original convening order and specifically identified the court-martial as a general court-martial effectively modified the original order”. U.S. v. Glover 15 M.J. 419 CMA,(1983).

Tags: Military+Law, millitary+lawyer, attorney+military, military, military+divorce+lawyer, AWOL, UCMJ, JAG, Armed+Forces, Army, Navy, Marine+Corps, Coast+Guard, National+Guard

UCMJ Military Law Lawyers

Sris — Wed, 16 Apr 2008 20:15:19 +0000

“Even though court-martial convening order reciting that “A special court-martial is hereby convened.” may have begun its life as a special court-martial, it became a general court-martial when the convening authority said it was a general court-martial in referral and this fiat accorded with his intent”. U.S. v. Glover 15 M.J. 419 CMA,(1983).

Tags: Military+Law, millitary+lawyer, attorney+military, military, military+divorce+lawyer, AWOL, UCMJ, JAG, Armed+Forces, Army, Navy, Marine+Corps, Coast+Guard, National+Guard

UCMJ Military Law Lawyers

Sris — Wed, 16 Apr 2008 20:15:12 +0000

“Fact that court-martial convening order recited that “A special court-martial is hereby convened.” did not rise to the level of prejudice to the accused and sentence could be adjudged exceeding the maximum punishment allowed for special court-martial, where there was no question but that convening authority had intended to refer case to general court-martial and thought he was so doing, intent of the convening authority was known to all parties, including accused, and all acted accordingly. U.S. v. Glover 15 M.J. 419 CMA,(1983).

Tags: Military+Law, millitary+lawyer, attorney+military, military, military+divorce+lawyer, AWOL, UCMJ, JAG, Armed+Forces, Army, Navy, Marine+Corps, Coast+Guard, National+Guard

UCMJ Military Law Lawyers

Sris — Wed, 16 Apr 2008 20:15:04 +0000

“Without showing of unavoidability, presumption that convening authority properly exercised his discretion when he detailed junior members to accused’s court-martial was applicable”.

Tags: Military+Law, millitary+lawyer, attorney+military, military, military+divorce+lawyer, AWOL, UCMJ, JAG, Armed+Forces, Army, Navy, Marine+Corps, Coast+Guard, National+Guard

UCMJ Military Law Lawyers

Sris — Wed, 16 Apr 2008 20:14:52 +0000

“Accused’s failure to object to appointment of “frocked” members to accused’s court-martial waived any defect in detailing such members, who were junior in rank to accused”. U.S. v. McGee 15 M.J. 1004 NMCMR,(1983).

Tags: Military+Law, millitary+lawyer, attorney+military, military, military+divorce+lawyer, AWOL, UCMJ, JAG, Armed+Forces, Army, Navy, Marine+Corps, Coast+Guard, National+Guard

UCMJ Military Law Lawyers

Sris — Wed, 16 Apr 2008 20:14:39 +0000

“Court-martial had jurisdiction to try accused even though three of the sitting members were junior in rank to the accused”. U.S. v. McGee 15 M.J. 1004 NMCMR,(1983).
If you are charged with a UCMJ military offense or need counsel on a military matter, then contact a military lawyer of the SRIS Law Group. Our military lawyers are experts at defending and providing counsel to clients regarding UCMJ military matters. When you contact a SRIS Law Group military attorney, a military lawyer from our firm will discuss the facts of your case and advise you as to your options. If you need legal counsel, then contact a military lawyer at the law offices of SRIS Law Group, PC, to speak with a military attorney.

Tags: Military+Law, millitary+lawyer, attorney+military, military, military+divorce+lawyer, AWOL, UCMJ, JAG, Armed+Forces, Army, Navy, Marine+Corps, Coast+Guard, National+Guard

UCMJ Military Law Lawyers

Sris — Wed, 16 Apr 2008 20:14:28 +0000

“Violation of Article prohibiting enlisted member of court-martial from being from same unit as accused is not jurisdictional bar to trial”. U.S. v. McGee 15 M.J. 1004 NMCMR,(1983).

Tags: Military+Law, millitary+lawyer, attorney+military, military, military+divorce+lawyer, AWOL, UCMJ, JAG, Armed+Forces, Army, Navy, Marine+Corps, Coast+Guard, National+Guard

UCMJ Military Law Lawyers

Sris — Wed, 16 Apr 2008 20:14:19 +0000

“Point in time to be used in determining disqualifying status of convening authority to appoint court-martial is time when court-martial was convened; thus, subsequent withdrawal of charges providing basis of disqualification will not act to retroactively confer jurisdiction where original employment was unauthorized”. U. S. v. McEnearney 1 M.J. 969 NCMR (1976).

Tags: Military+Law, millitary+lawyer, attorney+military, military, military+divorce+lawyer, AWOL, UCMJ, JAG, Armed+Forces, Army, Navy, Marine+Corps, Coast+Guard, National+Guard